By Andrew Rice | The Center Square
(Worthy News) – The U.S. Supreme Court will decide a case that seeks to remove a cap on how much political parties can spend on candidates.
National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission centers around a 2001 court decision that restricted political parties from funding campaign advertising with input from political candidates.
Then-Sen. J.D. Vance, R-Ohio, and former Rep. Steve Chabot, R-Ohio, said the Supreme Court’s earlier decision violates the First Amendment
“Coordinated party expenditure limits run afoul of modern campaign-finance doctrine and burden parties’ and candidates’ core political rights,” a letter to the high court reads.
The Federal Elections Commission reports Congressional candidates across the aisle in both the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate spent more than $3 billion on election campaigns between Jan. 1, 2023 and Dec. 31, 2024.
“That constitutional violation has harmed our political system by leading donors to send their funds elsewhere, fueling ‘the rise of narrowly focused super PACs’ and an attendant ‘fall of political parties power in the political marketplace, which has contributed to a spike in political polarization and fragmentation across the board,” the letter reads.
The Federal Election Campaign Act limits contributions to individual candidates each year. For fiscal year 2025-2026 the state and local political parties could only spend $10,000 on an individual candidate.
The letter referenced a campaign in Pennsylvania where a state political party spent less than $1.3 million on a Senate candidate to one in California where the party spent $3.8 million.
“That framework makes no sense if Congress thought that coordinated party expenditures above a certain threshold posed a risk of bribery; no one seriously thinks the purity of politicians tracks state lines,” the letter reads.
A judge in the sixth circuit court of appeals recognized that Vance and Chabot identified “several several ways in which tension has emerged between” the court’s 2001 ruling and more recent rulings on campaign finance law.
The Supreme Court will likely argue the case in the fall, with an anticipated decision in early 2026.
Copyright 1999-2025 Worthy News. This article was originally published on Worthy News and was reproduced with permission.
More Worthy News
The NATO military alliance has begun rolling out its defensive posture on its eastern flank bordering Belarus, Russia, and Ukraine. NATO leaders said the new equipment is aimed at deterring potential Russian aggression after at least 19 Russian drones entered Polish territory and Romania also reported a violation of its airspace.
Israel’s surprise strike on Hamas political leaders in Qatar showcased its growing arsenal of advanced ballistic missiles and its ability to deploy them at long range with precision, according to an exclusive report by the Wall Street Journal.
More than 100,000 people packed into central London on Saturday for what organizers billed as the largest free speech rally in British history. The “Unite the Kingdom” march, spearheaded by activist Tommy Robinson, featured a live video appearance by billionaire Elon Musk and a tribute to slain U.S. conservative activist Charlie Kirk.
Christians in Pakistan’s flood-hit Punjab province were among those struggling to survive Thursday, while in Indonesia, at least 19 people were confirmed dead after flash floods struck the tourist island of Bali and other regions as deadly monsoon waters swept across parts of South Asia.
Much of the world is mourning after the assassination of Charlie Kirk, the born-again Christian conservative leader, who inspired his generation and whose widow praised him as a loving husband with a deep faith in Jesus Christ.
The suspected gunman in the assassination of U.S. Christian conservative influencer Charlie Kirk surrendered after his father recognized him in police photos and, with help from a youth pastor, persuaded him to give up — a decision made harder by the possibility that his son could face the death penalty.
The United Nations General Assembly on Friday overwhelmingly endorsed a French and Saudi-led declaration urging Palestinian statehood and advancing the two-state solution, despite strong objections from Israel and the United States.