by Emmitt Barry, with reporting from Washington D.C. Bureau Staff
(Worthy News) – The Trump administration late on Nov. 25 filed a notice of appeal challenging a federal district court ruling that ordered the government to halt its months-long deployment of National Guard troops in Washington, D.C.
President Donald Trump had authorized the deployment under an Aug. 11 presidential memorandum, arguing that the District had “lost control of public order and safety” and citing violent crime rates as justification. The administration also said the Guard supported federal immigration enforcement operations in the capital.
U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb ruled on Nov. 20 that the deployment violated constitutional limits on presidential power, concluding that the president may activate the D.C. National Guard only under specific statutory conditions—not, as she wrote, under a “free-floating Article II power to deploy the Guard for the deterrence of crime.”
Cobb held that only Congress may define when the president can assume control of the D.C. Guard, and that federal law requires a request from local civil authorities before the Guard may be used for riot control or domestic disturbances—something the D.C. government did not issue. She paused her ruling for 21 days to allow for appeal.
Background: A Disputed History of Guard Authority in Washington
The legal battle unfolds against a long backdrop of contested federal authority over the D.C. National Guard. Unlike state Guards, the D.C. Guard is controlled directly by the president—a structure created by Congress and reaffirmed in multiple statutes over the past century.
Past disputes have touched on presidential limits as well. Courts have repeatedly upheld that presidential deployment of Guard forces domestically must be tied to specific statutory triggers such as the Insurrection Act, riot suppression statutes, or requests from local government. Judges have historically rejected broad claims of inherent presidential authority to use Guard troops for generalized crime control or policing functions.
Those precedents formed the core of Judge Cobb’s reasoning, who wrote that “historical practice confirms” that the president’s authority over the D.C. Guard is not open-ended.
Arguments from Both Sides
During October hearings, D.C. attorney Mitchell Reich argued the administration “has no statute authorizing” a policing-style deployment and warned the federal government’s interpretation would create an unchecked presidential police force in the capital.
Deputy Assistant U.S. Attorney General Eric Hamilton countered that Guard members were performing “protective functions” rather than law enforcement and said temporary detentions amounted to neutralizing threats, not enforcing laws.
The administration’s one-page notice of appeal did not outline its legal rationale but sends the case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, which will now decide how far presidential authority extends deploying the national guard over the capital.
Copyright 1999-2026 Worthy News. This article was originally published on Worthy News and was reproduced with permission.
More Worthy News
Israel expanded its military campaign against Hezbollah on Monday, striking more than 70 targets across Lebanon as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed to increase pressure on the Iranian-backed terror group following a sharp rise in drone and rocket attacks on northern Israel.
A federal appeals court is weighing whether Kansas City can use its public accommodation ordinance to require Christian counselors to counsel gay married couples despite the counselors’ biblical convictions on marriage and sexuality.
Tens of thousands of evangelical Christians gathered in the Netherlands for one of Europe’s largest multi-day Christian events, with organizers and participants expressing hopes for spiritual revival in the nation and across Europe.
President Donald Trump pushed back Monday against sharp criticism from Republicans and former administration officials over a potential U.S.-Iran agreement, insisting that any final accord must prevent Tehran from obtaining a nuclear weapon or it will not be signed.
President Donald Trump said Monday that countries involved in negotiations over Iran should be required to join the Abraham Accords, signaling that the White House is seeking to turn a possible Iran agreement into a wider regional realignment that includes normalization with Israel.
Tensions remained high in Serbia’s capital Belgrade on Sunday after at least tens of thousands of people demanded elections and rallied against what they view as the increasingly authoritarian rule of President Aleksandar Vučić, with violence erupting after the protest and more than 20 people arrested.
Investigations were ongoing Sunday into the killing of three senior Kuki-Thadou Christian church leaders by unidentified gunmen in India’s northeastern Manipur State, Christian investigators told Worthy News.